Search Results for "Section 164 CrPC statement"

355 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 355 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC and POCSO Act — Appellant Argues Contradictions in Evidence and Political Rivalry

The case arose from an incident on 19.11.2014 where a minor girl aged 16 years was allegedly abducted by three accused in a white Omni car. According ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Criminal Petition Seeking Redaction of Deposition in POCSO Case. Statement Under Section 164 CrPC Held Not Substantive Evidence; Reference by Witness in Deposition to Prior Statement Permissible for Contradiction/Corroboration Only.

The petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by the accused in a POCSO case seeking redaction of a portion of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Clarifying Weight of Section 164 CrPC Statements. Court Holds That Prior Recording of Statement Under Section 164 CrPC Does Not Automatically Render Trial Evidence Suspect But Requires Caution.

This appeal by special leave arose from the Allahabad High Court's confirmation of convictions under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company Directors Due to Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Bar. Allegations of Filing False Affidavits and Documents in Court Proceedings Required Court's Written Complaint, Not Private Complaint Under Section 156(3).

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by Shree Hari Rice & Agro Ltd. (respondent no.1) against M/s Lan Eseda Industries Ltd. (petitioner) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Prosecution to Refresh Witness Memory Using Section 161 CrPC Statement During Examination-in-Chief. Use of Section 161 Statement for Refreshing Memory Violates Section 162 CrPC and Section 159 Evidence Act.

The petitioner, Meena Tuyekar, the accused in a corruption case, challenged an order dated 18.1.2024 passed by the trial court allowing the Public Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge by Repeat Rape Convicts Against Section 376-E IPC. Sentencing Provision for Life Imprisonment for Repeat Sexual Offenders Alleged to be Arbitrary and Lacking Procedure.

Three writ petitions tagged together challenge the constitutional validity of Section 376-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), inserted by the Crim...