Search Results for "Section 16 Commercial Courts Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 16 Commercial Courts Act"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

28 Apr 2026

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commercial Summary Suit for Failure to Take Out Writ of Summons and Summons for Judgment Within One Year of Filing. Plaintiff's Delay in Serving Process Leads to Dismissal Under Order XXXVII Rule 2 and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

1 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Hikal Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit (CSS) against the defendant, Paxchem Limited, on 28 September 2021. The suit was filed u...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Bank to Rely on Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Procedural Flexibility Under Order VIII Rule 1A CPC and Commercial Courts Act. The Court held that refusal to allow additional documents at the stage of evidence would cause irreparable prejudice to the defendant-bank, as the documents were relevant to the defence and the plaintiff could be compensated by costs.

10 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Bank of Baroda, was the defendant in a commercial suit filed by the respondent, Gujarat Cables and Enamelled Products Pvt. Ltd., for r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Commercial Suit Due to COVID-19 Pandemic — Delay in Filing Written Statement Condoned. The Court held that the pandemic constituted sufficient cause for extension of time under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and the trial court's rejection was erroneous.

13 Dec 2021

The petitioners, defendants in a commercial suit filed by Pyrotek India Private Limited, challenged the order of the learned District Judge (Commercia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit. Pendency of Application Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Constitutes Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

22 Oct 2019

The petitioners, M/s S.S. Nikade and Company (JV), a registered firm, filed a commercial suit on 02.02.2017 before the Commercial Court, Yavatmal, cla...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)