Search Results for "Section 14A appeal"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Interest Deduction Under Section 36(1)(iii) — Section 14A Not Applicable When No Exempt Income Earned. Interest on Borrowed Capital Invested in Shares of Own Companies Held Allowable as Business Expenditure.

The appellant, Mahesh K. Mehta, a chartered accountant turned stock broker, acquired membership of the Bombay Stock Exchange in 1987 and the National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Interplay Between Sections 14A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 109 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 in Layout Approval Dispute

This matter concerns a writ petition filed by a House Building Co-operative Society against the Mandya Urban Development Authority (MUDA) and the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Upholding Withholding of Pension. Challenge centres on validity of departmental enquiry initiated post-retirement under Rule 14A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was filed by a retired Revenue Inspector challenging the order of the Karnataka State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order for Ignoring Binding Precedent in Section 14A Disallowance Case. Tribunal's refusal to follow earlier decision of the same court on identical issue held to be a jurisdictional error warranting interference under Article 226.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23 September ...