Search Results for "Section 139 NI Act"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Harshadkumar Vaikuthram Halani, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.

The appeal was filed by the complainant, Smt. G. Suma, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Quash Summons in Cheque Dishonour Case — Factual Defences Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Section 482 CrPC. Legal Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Favours Complainant at Pre-Trial Stage.

The appellant, Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan, was the accused in a criminal complaint filed by Satish Gupta (respondent no. 2) under Section 138 of the Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, a registered partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent for d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant could not establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability as invoices were raised in name of third party, not the accused.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the complainant, M/s. Shradha Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd., against the judgment of the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Court Holds That Stop Payment Instruction Does Not Absolve Drawer of Liability When Cheque Was Issued for Discharge of Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Kamal Babulal Sharma, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 08/06/2001 passed by the 9th Judicial Magistrate, Fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant Partner. Failure to Prove Legal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, against the acquittal of Laxman Vithal Chunek...