Search Results for "Section 124A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Section 124A"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation and Quashes Sedition Charge Against Cartoonist. Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) Protects Political Satire and Cartoons Unless They Incite Violence or Public Disorder.

17 Mar 2015

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by Sanskar Marathe, a practicing advocate, challenging the arrest of Assem Trivedi, a political carto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Death Case. Claimants failed to establish wrongful act, neglect or default on part of railway administration to claim compensation over and above the statutory amount under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

27 Jan 2016

The appellants, parents of the deceased Siju S. Vallikalayil, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Family of Deceased Passenger in Railway Accident Case. Death of a bonafide passenger due to being knocked down by a train while crossing tracks between stations constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the absence of a ticket on the body does not negate bonafide passenger status.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal filed by the original applicants (the family of the deceased) against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Death Case — Untoward Incident Under Section 124A Railways Act, 1989 Established. Sudden Jerk While Alighting from Train Constitutes an Untoward Incident, and Railway's Denial of Ticket Validity Not Sustained.

18 Jul 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Recovery Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Prospective Levy of Land Development Charges Under Section 124A of MRTP Act, 1966 — No Retrospective Recovery for Pre-1992 Permissions. Rain Harvesting Charges and Audit Objections Also Raised.

28 Sep 2017

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard a public interest litigation (Writ Petition No.4264/2009) concerning three issues: levy and recovery of la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Passenger Falling from Moving Train While Boarding - Untoward Incident Under Railways Act. The court held that an accident caused from a moving train while trying to board or deboard it is covered by the definition of 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the appellant's amputation injury is covered by the amended schedule, entitling him to compensation.

3 Jul 2017

The appellant, Shashikant Dhage, filed a claim under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation for grievous injuries sustained in a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Deceased Vendor's Family — Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration failed to prove the exception of self-inflicted injury, and the death of a passenger selling articles in a train is an untoward incident attracting strict liability.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Railway Clai...

High Court

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

20 Jun 2024

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Widow and Children Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Death of a passenger due to accidental fall from train is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is liable to pay compensation regardless of negligence.

10 Jul 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, the widow and children of the deceased Ramlu Renalwar, challenging the judgment and award of t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)