Search Results for "Section 124-A"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Untoward Incident Presumed Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's fall from train due to sudden jerk or push constitutes an untoward incident; railway's defense of suicide or self-inflicted injury not established.

The appellants, being the father, mother, and brother of the deceased Ganesh Vasanta Kajale, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Development Charge Levy Dispute. Development Charge on Already Developed Land Held Illegal Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Sir Gangadharrao Chitnavis Memorial Medical Research Trust, a charitable trust, owned Plot No. 56 at Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed 'Accidental Fall' Not Suicide Under Section 124A(a) of Railways Act, 1989. Court holds that mere statement of guard without corroboration is insufficient to prove suicide, and presumption of bonafide passenger stands.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which rejected the claim of the appellants (legal heirs of deceased Nanda Gi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Death Case. Claimants failed to establish wrongful act, neglect or default on part of railway administration to claim compensation over and above the statutory amount under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Siju S. Vallikalayil, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation and Quashes Sedition Charge Against Cartoonist. Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) Protects Political Satire and Cartoons Unless They Incite Violence or Public Disorder.

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by Sanskar Marathe, a practicing advocate, challenging the arrest of Assem Trivedi, a political carto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Death Case — Untoward Incident Under Section 124A Railways Act, 1989 Established. Sudden Jerk While Alighting from Train Constitutes an Untoward Incident, and Railway's Denial of Ticket Validity Not Sustained.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Recovery Cla...