Search Results for "Section 114(g) Evidence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Section 114(g) Evidence Act"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Non-Examination of Key Witness and Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act. Sale Deed in Favour of Plaintiffs Proved Valid, Subsequent Transfers by Vendor After Losing Title Held Void.

9 Mar 2026

The present First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants-original plaintiffs challenging the judgme...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal and Restores Trial Court's Decree. Held that the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's judgment without properly considering the evidence regarding possession and title.

5 Jan 2026

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for bare injunction in O.S.No.52 of 2008 before the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur, seeking to restrain ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death of Driver in Course of Employment Entitles Dependents to Compensation. Employer's Failure to Produce Evidence Leads to Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act.

17 Jan 2022

The appeal arises from the dismissal of an application for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, by the Commissioner for Workmen's ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Records Leads to Adverse Inference. The court held that non-production of attendance registers by the employer under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act warrants an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitling employees to regularization.

23 Jan 2013

The appellants, Rama Atmaram Dahiwal and Mahadeo Karbhari Shinde, were daily wage employees of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (respondent). They f...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)