Search Results for "Section 11 Award"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Additional Compensation at Rs. 37 per sqm for Narmada Project Canal. Reference Court's reliance on earlier comparable sale instance with similar notification date held valid under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The present appeal was filed by the State of Gujarat through the Special Land Acquisition Officer and others, challenging the judgment and award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Upholds Additional Compensation for Dharoi Canal Project. Court Relies on Coordinate Bench Precedent for Same Village and Common Group, Finding No Ground to Interfere with Reference Court's Award.

The present appeal was filed by the State under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Canal Project — Market Value Increased from Rs. 10 to Rs. 110.70 per sqm. Reference Court's Determination Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Principles of Fair Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The case pertains to three first appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case - Market Value Enhanced to Rs.30 per sq.mtr. for Village Percolation Tank Project. Potential Value and Comparable Sale Instance Considered Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by original claimants whose agricultural lands in village Vaiju Babhulgaon, Taluka Pathardi, District A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Owner's Petition for Rental Compensation Prior to Section 4 Notification in Land Acquisition Case. Possession Lost Before Notification Does Not Entitle Owner to Additional Compensation Under Section 34 or Rental Compensation Under Government Policy.

The petitioner, Tukaram Maruti Pawar, was a land owner whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a minor irrigation project. He lost pos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Statutory Corporation Seeking Recovery of Compensation from Landowners After Acquisition Lapse. Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 11 Award Does Not Create Debt Obligation; Remedy Lies in Civil Court.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, a statutory corporation established under the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Developme...