Search Results for "Section 108 statement"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Arrears of Rent, Damage, and Unauthorized Construction Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Doctrine of Relation Back Not Applicable as Amendment Was Not Allowed to Relate Back to Original Filing Date.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by tenants (Anil Joginder Sachdev and Rajeev Joginder Sachdev) against a decree of eviction passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the failure of the appellants to explain the death of the deceased after being last seen together led to an inference of guilt under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

The appellants, Santosh Tanbaji Durge and Raju @ Rajesh Vasanta Gudapwar, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 364, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. Co-owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Another Co-owner Without Ouster Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Suresh Chatra, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession. Customs Department Failed to Prove Possession of Contraband by Employees in Open Godown.

The appeal was filed by the Assistant Collector of Customs against the acquittal of the respondents for offences under Sections 29, 21 read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Applicants in Kidnapping and Theft Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Mere Presence Without Overt Act or Common Intention Does Not Sustain Charges Under Sections 363, 380, 34 IPC.

The applicants, Manikrao Kale, Meher Kale, and Manish Muley, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Change of User from Residential to Commercial. Tenant's Use of Premises for Storing Cloth Packages and Business Constitutes Change of User Under Rent Control Legislation.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate C...