Search Results for "Sandalwood Trees"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court dismissed Writ Petition Challenging Confiscation of Forest Produce and Vehicle Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Confiscation Order sustained.

The dispute originated from the confiscation of red sanders logs and a transport vehicle by forest authorities in Maharashtra. The petitioners, transp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision, Dismisses Appeals in Sandalwood Confiscation Case: Forest Department Directed to Adhere to Government Scheme

Forest Offence, Sandalwood Confiscation, Kerala Forest Act, Government Scheme 1. Background: The appeals arising from the High Court judgment date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kerala Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Statutory Interpretation. Sandalwood Oil Not Classified as Forest Produce Under Section 2(f), and Prosecution Failed to Prove Illicit Removal from Reserve Forest as Required Under Section 27(1)(d).

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, involving the appellant, a partner in a firm manufacturing and trading ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antecedents. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 62, 86, 87 of Karnataka Forest Act and Rule 154 of Karnataka Forest Rules.

The petitioner, Mr. Vijay Kumar K., filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in F.O.C.N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in Forest Land Conversion Case — Refund of Compulsory Deposit Ordered by Single Judge Set Aside. Deposit under Section 79A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 for conversion of forest land to non-forest purpose is not refundable upon grant of permission.

The State of Karnataka, through the Deputy Conservator of Forests and other authorities, filed a writ appeal against an order of a learned Single Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove illegal transportation of sandalwood beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioners, four individuals, were convicted by the Trial Court (Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi) in C.C. No. 5462/2006 for an offence under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Alleging Illegal Quarrying and Trespass into Reserve Forest for Lack of Specific Allegations. Court holds that a PIL cannot be entertained based on vague allegations without proper verification and specific details of violations.

The petitioner, Mr. Kishore K Vasu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litigat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Writ Petition Maintainable Against Sessions Judge's Order Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 Despite Finality Clause. Finality Clause Under Section 61G Does Not Bar Constitutional Remedy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 01/08/2017 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manik s/o Hiraman Rathod and Balu s/o Bhaurao Rathod, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.149 of 2004 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Confiscated Truck in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Not Given Adequate Opportunity of Hearing. Confiscation Order Under Section 61-A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, owner of a truck bearing registration number MH-30-B-2897, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...