Search Results for "Rule 90(3) ultra vires"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 90(3) of CGST Rules as Ultra Vires in Refund Re-Application Case. Rule 90(3) requiring fresh refund application within two years of relevant date held inconsistent with Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Saiher Supply Chain Consulting Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NDMC Appeals in Property Tax Dispute — Upholds Unit Area Method as Valid. The impugned Bye-laws are not ultra vires the NDMC Act, 1994, as they fall within the rule-making power under Section 388 and are consistent with Section 63.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the Delhi High Court judgment dated August 10, 2017, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate General's Ex-Officio Membership. Court upholds Advocate General's membership in Bar Council under Section 55 of Advocates Act, 1961 and dismisses allegations of electoral irregularities.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the composition and election of the Bar Council of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate Enrollment Rules. Court upholds Bar Council of India's power to prescribe enrollment conditions under Section 49 of Advocates Act, 1961 and rejects challenge to election process for lack of merit.

The petitioner, Manubhai Paragji Vashi, an advocate aged about 79 years, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election p...