Search Results for "Rule 22(6) MCR 1960"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Rule 22(6) MCR 1960"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Cheque Bounce Case — Petitioner Allowed to Furnish PR Bond. Court holds that custodial interrogation is not warranted when the accused is willing to cooperate and the offence is bailable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Shankesh Prithviraj Sanghvi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Order Removing Lands from Mining Lease in Mineral Auction Dispute. Transfer of Mining Lease Valid Under Rule 22(6) of MCR 1960, State Cannot Unilaterally Excise Lease Area for Auction Without Following Due Process.

19 Nov 2019

The petitioner, M/s. J.K. Cement Limited, held a mining lease (ML No. 2344A) over certain lands in Metagudda Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Mining Lease Renewal Applications — Failure to Consider Application on Merits and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the Revision Authority must consider the renewal application on its own merits and not merely rely on the rejection of a previous application.

27 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Vishal Vinayak Bandekar, proprietor of M/s V. N. Bandekar, filed two writ petitions challenging the order of the Revision Authority (C...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)