Search Results for "Rule 214 KCSR"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order — No Entitlement to Difference in Pension Without Proper Claim. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to differential pension under Karnataka Municipal Administration Service Rules.

The petitioner, Sadashivappa, a retired civil servant from the Karnataka Municipal Administration Service, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order on Pensionary Benefits. Petitioner's claim for difference in pension based on notional promotion rejected as no right to promotion exists and claim is stale.

The petitioner, a retired civil servant, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 06....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Government Servant as Barred by Limitation Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement for Events More Than Four Years Old Held Without Jurisdiction Under Rule 214(2)(b)(ii).

The petitioner, a Junior Engineer in the Mysore City Corporation, challenged the disciplinary proceedings initiated after his retirement. He had been ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Upholding Withholding of Pension. Challenge centres on validity of departmental enquiry initiated post-retirement under Rule 14A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was filed by a retired Revenue Inspector challenging the order of the Karnataka State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Government Officer Due to Bar Under Civil Services Rules — Prosecution for Misappropriation of Funds Held Barred by Rule 214(3) and (6) of Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958 as Sanction Was Not Obtained.

The petitioner, a former Block Development Officer, was accused of misappropriating Rs.11,47,360/- during 2004-2005. An FIR was registered under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...