Search Results for "Rule 209A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Rule 209A"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Modvat Credit Case — Upholds CESTAT's Order Setting Aside Demand and Penalty for Violation of Natural Justice. The demand under repealed Rule 57-I was invalid after substitution by CENVAT Rules 2002 and the assessee was denied effective opportunity of hearing.

1 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 27 May 2005 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

21 Sep 2010

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Central Excise in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Erred in Holding No Provision for Penalty Under Central Excise Act or Rules. Rule 209 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 Provides for Penalty for Offences Relating to Excisable Goods.

14 Sep 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal against the order dated 31st March 2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Third Member Reference and Remand Ambiguity. The court held that the third member cannot go beyond the referred question and the remand order was ambiguous, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

7 Apr 2006

The case involves an appeal by M/s. Kelkar Trading Corporation and Shri Chintamani Shridhar Kelkar against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Filing of Statement Under Section 209A Does Not Automatically Lead to Underestimation of Advance Tax for Section 216 Interest. Interest under Section 216 of Income Tax Act, 1961 requires a finding of underestimation of income or profits, not merely a difference between estimated and actual income.

22 Aug 2005

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which upheld the deleti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Illegal Demolition of Building Without Notice. Demolition Without Prior Notice Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Violates Natural Justice.

22 Feb 2005

The petitioners, purchasers of flats in a building known as Vishal Towers at 107, Motishaw Lane, Mazgaon, Mumbai, filed a writ petition against the Mu...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)