Search Results for "Rule 17(8)"

677 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 677 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Transmission Corporation and Regulatory Commission in Electricity Tariff Disputes. Wheeling Charges and Grid Support Charges Upheld as Valid Levies Under Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the levy of wheeling charges and grid support charges by the Transmission Corporation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(h1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Disqualification Quashed as No Prior Order Under Section 140 or 178 of the Act Was Passed Against the Petitioner.

The petitioner, Subhash Sakharam Shelke, was a member of Gram Panchayat, Shirpur, District Buldhana. Respondent No.3, Samadhan Waman Shelke, filed pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Continuous Hostile Possession for Over 12 Years Under Section 100 CPC.

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Dispute — Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy. Court Refuses to Interfere with Arbitrator's Findings on Demurrage and Hire Charges Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...