Search Results for "Rule 12-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Rule 12-A"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Exemption from Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Upheld as Suit Contemplated Urgent Interim Relief Based on Plaintiff's Apprehension of Asset Disposal to Defeat Claim.

4 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit filed by  Respondents, a non-banking financial company, against Applicants for recovery of appro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Suit Filed Without Urgent Interim Relief and Without Mandatory Mediation is Barred.

17 Nov 2025

The defendant, Dipti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking reje...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Rejects Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court holds that a plaint cannot be rejected on the ground of non-joinder of necessary parties or lack of cause of action when the plaintiff seeks declaration of partnership rights and accounts.

25 Sep 2025

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Mrs. Bhagyashree Jain against M/s. Vyshnavi Visions and its partners, challenging the trial court's ord...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in Commercial Suit for Possession. The Court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the question of limitation was a mixed question of fact and law, not amenable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

25 Jun 2025

The petitioners, who were defendants in a commercial suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff, challenged an order dated 28.02.2025 passed by the IV Add...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Commercial IP Infringement Suit — Pre-Institution Mediation Not Mandatory When Urgent Interim Relief Sought. Expression 'contemplates any urgent interim relief' in Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 includes cases where the plaint itself seeks urgent interim relief, regardless of whether an application is separately filed.

1 Jan 2025

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, which affirmed an order of a Single Judge rejecting the...

High Court

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

14 Nov 2024

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.

11 Nov 2024

The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case for Withdrawal of CIRP Based on Settlement Before CoC Constitution. Withdrawal Application Under Section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Granted as Settlement Was Genuine and Committee of Creditors Not Constituted, Invoking Inherent Powers Under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016.

28 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by a suspended director of Manpasand Beverages Ltd., the corporate debtor, against an order of the National Com...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)