Search Results for "Right to cross-examination"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Order in Passage Obstruction Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses and Adduce Evidence Under Section 5 of Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906.

The petitioner, Sudhir Yashwant Dhangade, challenged the orders dated 16/06/2017 and 02/01/2018 passed by the learned Tehsildar (Mamlatdar), Chiplun a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Cancelling Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Committee Failed to Provide Documents and Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant, Rendering Proceedings Void Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Bhanudas Hona Gajbhiv, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Scheduled Cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Cross-Examination in Civil Suit — Right to Cross-Examine Restored with Condition of Same-Day Examination. The court held that the right to cross-examine is valuable but can be conditioned on cooperation for speedy disposal.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit, challenged an order of the trial court that denied them permission to cross-examine the plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SDM Order Under Section 133 CrPC for Denial of Natural Justice — Remand for Fresh Hearing Ordered. Revisional Court Cannot Exercise Appellate Powers Under Section 401(1) CrPC.

The petitioners, Shyam and Arvind Parate, operated Anushree Agro Industry (Poultry Centre) in Nagbhid, Chandrapur. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition in Service Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Direction for Fresh Enquiry from Stage of Cross-Examination. Denial of Cross-Examination Violates Natural Justice Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Secretary and Principal of Pratibha Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (the management) against the order of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SDM Order in Property Dispute Under Section 145 CrPC for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Copies of Documents and Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses Renders Proceedings Void.

The applicants, seven individuals from Ajanti, Ner, Yavatmal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ...