Search Results for "Right to Practice Profession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Right to Practice Profession"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Directors' Petition Against Disqualification of DINs in Companies Act Case — Violation of Article 19(1)(g) Right to Practice Profession. Blocking of Director Identification Numbers without Notice and Hearing Held Illegal Under Section 164(2) of Companies Act, 2013.

25 Jul 2025

The petitioners, Mr. Dilipraj Pukkella and Mr. Muhammed Imthiyaz, directors of M/s. Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Police Harassment of Beautician — Violation of Right to Practice Profession Under Article 19(1)(g). Police officials directed to permit petitioner to carry on her beauty parlor business without interference and to pay costs of Rs. 25,000.

25 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Shakuntala Karamveer Sarsath, a beautician by occupation, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India allegin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Medical Students' Petition Against NEET PG 2021 Internship Cut-off Date, Quashes Circular as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. The court held that fixing 30th June, 2021 as cut-off for internship completion to qualify for NEET PG 2021 counselling was arbitrary and violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, medical graduates who completed their MBBS and internship, challenged the cut-off date of 30th June, 2021 fixed by the State of Mahar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Relaxes Stringent Bail Conditions for Medical Students Accused of Abetting Suicide: Suspension of Medical Licenses and Restriction on Leaving Mumbai Modified. The Court held that suspension of medical licenses pending trial is disproportionate and violates the right to practice profession under Article 19(1)(g), and modified conditions to allow professional practice and completion of education.

8 Sep 2020

The appellants, three postgraduate medical students, were accused of abetting the suicide of their junior colleague, Dr. Payal Tadvi, who belonged to ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ESIC Compulsory Service Bond for MBBS Graduates — Bond Violates Right to Practice Profession Under Article 19(1)(g) and Lacks Statutory Backing. The court held that the bond requiring MBBS graduates to serve ESIC for 5 years is an unreasonable restriction without statutory authority.

14 Feb 2020

The petitioners, MBBS graduates who completed their PG or MBBS from ESIC Medical College, were directed by the ESIC Corporation to execute a bond for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Registration Requirement for Physiotherapists in Maharashtra State Council for Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Act, 2002 — Constitutional Challenge Dismissed. The court held that Sections 20 and 21 of the Act are valid as they impose reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health, not violating Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

31 Jan 2014

The petitioners, citizens of India and residents of Maharashtra, obtained Bachelor of Physiotherapy (BPT) degrees from Dr. C.V. Raman University, esta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Doctors' Challenge to Bond Posting Policy - State Directed to Post Doctors in Positions Commensurate with Their Qualifications. The court held that enforcing a bond to serve in non-commensurate postings violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

20 Oct 2011

The petitioners, a group of doctors with super specialty (DM/M.Ch), broad specialty (MD/MS), and PG diploma qualifications, challenged the State Gover...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Age Limit for Document Writers in Maharashtra — Circular Barring Practice Beyond 60 Years Held Unconstitutional. Court rules that the Registration Act, 1908 and Maharashtra Registration Manual contain no provision for age-based disqualification, and the circular violates Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

28 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Chaitram Chindhuji Wasnik, a document writer by profession, had been granted a licence to practice as a document writer in 1982 for th...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)