Search Results for "Revision excluded"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Revision excluded"

892 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 892 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR and Revisional Order for Violation of Accused's Right to Hearing in Criminal Revision. The court held that Section 401(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 mandates hearing for accused or other persons in revisional proceedings, and Sessions Judge's failure to hear petitioners before allowing revision against dismissal of Section 156(3) application rendered the order and subsequent FIR invalid.

2 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a criminal writ petition filed by two petitioners, a senior citizen and her daughter, seeking to quash an FIR registered agains...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR and Sessions Court Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Accused Not Heard in Revision Against Rejection of Section 156(3) CrPC Application. The court held that the accused must be heard before the Revisional Court when a revision is filed against the rejection of a Section 156(3) CrPC application, as failure to do so violates principles of natural justice.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Smt. Shaila Damodar Sinai Borkar and Dr. Priti Siddsh Kharangate, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at G...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Rejection of Default Bail and Cognizance in NDPS Case. Court’s Analysis Focuses on Maintainability Under Section 397 CrPC and Application of Precedents.

24 May 2021

The judgment of the High Court of Karnataka arises from two criminal revision petitions filed by the accused No.3, challenging the orders of the Speci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Condonation Delay in Himachal Pradesh VAT Act — Section 5 Limitation Act Applicable. High Court's revisional power under Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 includes power to condone delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Section 29(2) applies unless expressly excluded.

25 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment dated 19.11.2018, which refused to condone delay in filing rev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

25 Sep 2019

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Religious Endowments Case — Commissioner Not a Court, Section 5 Limitation Act Not Applicable. Delay Condonation by Commissioner Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Set Aside as Commissioner Lacks Power to Apply Section 5 of Limitation Act.

3 May 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the right to receive first respect as an Ambalam in a village in Tamil Nadu. The appellant, Ganesan, throug...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Revision under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Holding Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies. The Court ruled that a revision under Section 201-B is a 'petition' covered by Section 239-B, which expressly incorporates Sections 4, 5, 12, and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and no provision excludes condonation of delay.

7 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from a demolition order issued by the Village Panchayat of Queula against the petitioner for alleged illegal construction, based on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Revision Under Section 115 CPC Not Maintainable Against Small Causes Court Decree Under Section 26A of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; Writ Under Article 227 Is Maintainable. The court resolved a conflict between two single judge decisions regarding the remedy available against decrees passed under Section 26A of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887.

7 Dec 2016

The case involved two writ petitions placed before a larger bench due to a conflict of decisions by single judges of the Bombay High Court regarding t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maintainability of Civil Revision Against Director's Order Under Section 66(7) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act. Order of Director of Panchayats under Section 66(7) is final and binding, and no Civil Revision lies under Section 201-B of the Act.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Competent Automobiles Company Ltd., applied for a licence to construct a Beach Resort at village Arossim, Goa, based on a technical cl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India Examines Constitutional Validity of Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision Order for Bihar. Petitions Filed Under Article 32 of Constitution of India Allege Potential Disenfranchisement and Arbitrariness in Voter Roll Purge Contrary to Universal Adult Suffrage Guarantee.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the Election Commission of India's O...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)