Search Results for "Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Drivers' Petition for Time Bound Promotion Scheme Benefits. Government Resolution dated 17.5.2003 Quashed as Discriminatory Against Drivers in Zilla Parishads.

The petitioners, four drivers employed by Zilla Parishads in Gadchiroli, Amravati, and Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Career Progression Schemes. Employees Governed by Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, 2009 Retrospectively as Eligibility Under Assured Career Progression Scheme, 1999 Does Not Create Vested Right.

The dispute arose between the Union of India and its employees regarding the applicable career progression scheme. The employees, working as Junior En...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Pay Fixation Dispute Under CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Rule 11 Applies When Employee Opts for Revised Pay from Date of ACP Upgradation, Not Rule 7.

The case involves a dispute over the correct rule for pay fixation under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. The respondent, Raj Kum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...