Search Results for "Repugnancy"

135 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 135 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Priority to Secured Creditors Over Attached Assets in NSEL Scam Case. Secured Creditors Under SARFAESI Act and RDB Act Have Priority Over Attachments Under PMLA and MPID Act, and Moratorium Under IBC Does Not Bar Execution Against Properties Attached Under MPID Act.

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed two priority questions of law arising from the NSEL scam, where the petitioner, National Spot Exchange Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes State Order on Solvent Licensing for Repugnancy with Central Order. Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 struck down as ultra vires the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 due to conflict with Central Order of 2000.

The Petitioner, Indian Small Scale Paint Association Society, challenged the Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 as being re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Goa Children's Act, 2003 as Premature. Petitioner Convicted for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Cannot Challenge State Legislation When Appeal Against Conviction is Pending.

The petitioner, Rohan Pradeep Dhungat, was convicted by the Goa Children's Court in Special Case No.28/2006 for offences including kidnapping for rans...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Licensing Requirement for Food Business — Holds That MMC Act and FSS Act Can Coexist Without Repugnancy. Section 394(1)(e) of MMC Act, 1888 is Not Void Under Article 254 as It Operates in a Different Field of Municipal Regulation.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar, a food business operator, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...