Search Results for "Representation Disposal"

1486 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1486 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation by Advisory Board. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Grounds of Detention Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Shrinivas Kishor Sanga, challenged his detention order dated 30/10/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Representation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Detenu's Representation to Advisory Board Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 10 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged an order of detention dated 17 October 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Chirag D. Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unreasonable Delay in Considering Representation. Unexplained Delay of 25 Days in Deciding Representation Renders Detention Illegal Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Mr. Rizwan @ Tippu Sattar Pathan, challenged an order of detention dated 5th May 2014 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Pre...