Search Results for "Reply Statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Reply Statement"

6813 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6813 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Revision Against Dismissal of Reply Statement Application in Specific Performance Suit Due to Delay and Absence of New Facts. Court Upholds Trial Court Order Finding That Written Statement Did Not Raise Any New Question of Fact and Application Was Belated.

27 Jul 2026

The petitioner filed a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction based on an agreement of sale dated 15.01.2005, claiming that the entire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition of Unauthorized Structure Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Affidavit-in-Reply to Notice of Motion Cannot Be Treated as Written Statement.

4 May 2011

The appellant, M/s. B. Jayantilal, a partnership firm, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendant to File Written Statement Despite Delay, Setting Aside Trial Court's Rejection. Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory; jurisdictional challenge under Section 9-A does not bar subsequent filing of written statement; trial court's rejection without considering merits set aside.

22 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Pramod Baliram Wavge, was the defendant in Regular Civil Suit No.17/2004 before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Patur. He appeared on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendant's Reply to Temporary Injunction to be Treated as Written Statement in Civil Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Construction of Pleadings Under CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. Reply Containing Full Defense and Referred to as Written Statement by Trial Court Must Be Accepted as Written Statement Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.

5 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Hirabai Vasant Patil, was the original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No.145 of 2007 filed by the respondent, Sitaram Nago alias Namd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement to Include Adverse Possession Plea Despite Earlier Rejection, Holding Res Judicata Not Applicable to Interlocutory Orders. The court set aside the trial court's order and permitted the amendment subject to costs, emphasizing that principles of res judicata do not bar subsequent applications for amendment of pleadings when the earlier rejection was based on a different factual scenario.

14 Jan 2010

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for perpetual injunction relating to immovable property, had initially filed a reply to the plaintiffs' applicat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Treatment of Reply as Written Statement in CPC Case — No Prejudice as Reply Filed Within 90 Days and Verified. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is directory; treating a timely filed and verified reply to an injunction application as written statement does not cause prejudice to the plaintiffs.

9 Feb 2010

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a civil suit, challenged an order of the trial court dated 30 January 2010. By that order, the trial court acc...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Plaintiff to File Rejoinder to Amended Written Statement Under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC — Trial Court's Rejection of Amendment Application Set Aside. Plaintiff Entitled to File Additional Pleading When Written Statement is Amended, Though Not Specifically Defined in CPC.

15 Jun 2015

The petitioners, plaintiffs in O.S. No.39/2013 before the Senior Civil Judge Court at Challakere, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial IP Suit — Delay of 410 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. Policy Changes and Preoccupation of Legal Team Held Not to Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.

26 May 2020

The case involves a commercial IP suit filed by Metro Shoes Ltd (Plaintiff) against Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. and Tech-Connect Retail Pvt. Ltd. (Defend...

High Court

Bombay High Court Permits Official Liquidator to File Criminal Complaint Under Section 454 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Ex-Directors for Non-Filing of Statement of Affairs. Court Directs Ex-Directors to Deposit Rs. 11,30,743/- as Estimated Cost of Investigation.

1 Aug 2014

The Bombay High Court considered an Official Liquidator's Report (OLR No. 5 of 2013) in the winding up of Phoenix Alchemy Pvt. Ltd. The company was or...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition in Arbitration and Civil Suit Context — Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Reference Upheld. Ruling Clarifies That Filing Reply to Interim Injunction Application Does Not Amount to 'First Statement on Substance' Precluding Arbitration.

25 Jun 2015

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 17 July 1997 between the petitioner (Navalji Cotspin Limited) and respondent No. 1 (Amravati Growers Co-oper...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)