Search Results for "Reopening of Proceedings"

4 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...