Search Results for "Registry Discrimination"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition Alleging Registry Discrimination in Listing Cases. Petition Under Article 32 Found Unmaintainable Due to Careless Conduct and Lack of Evidence, with Court Upholding Registry's Functioning During COVID-19 Pandemic.

The petitioner, an advocate practicing in the Supreme Court, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India against officers of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Visually Disabled Candidate Denied Job Gets Relief: Supreme Court Orders Appointment in Coal India Case (2026 INSC 53) Procedural technicalities like “expiry of recruitment panel” cannot defeat justice.

Sujata Bora, a visually impaired candidate, applied for a Management Trainee post in Coal India in 2019 under the disability quota. She cleared the se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...