Search Results for "Refund with interest"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Holder Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Continuous Readiness and Willingness Must Be Established Throughout the Period of Contract Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 10.06.2006. The plaintiff, T.K.Kandhaswamy, sought to enforce the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Against Army Welfare Housing Organization for Non-Compliance of State Commission Order. Refund of ₹56,90,577 with 9% Interest Ordered Due to Failure to Furnish Required Documents.

The case pertains to a consumer dispute where Lt. Col. Sarfraz Singh (appellant) filed a complaint against Army Welfare Housing Organization & Anr. (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Consumer Case Against Builder for Delayed Possession. Builder's Failure to Deliver Villa by Agreed Date Constitutes Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The case involves an appeal by Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd. and another against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Unfair Trade Practice Case, Denies Specific Performance. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Due to Buyer's Default Under Clause 10 of Plot Buyer's Agreement.

The appellant, Sudha Gupta, filed an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 read with Section 55 of the repealed Monopolies and Restric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Salary from Retired Head Teacher Due to Delay and Lack of Misrepresentation. Recovery of overpayment made to a retired employee after a lapse of 4 years 11 months from retirement is unsustainable in law.

The petitioner, Donald Daniel Ferreira, was initially appointed as a Teacher in respondent no.9 school on 1 August 1990 and later appointed as Head Te...