Search Results for "Redetermination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Redetermination"

48 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case for Re-determination Under Section 28-A. The Court held that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, being a beneficial provision, permits re-determination of compensation based on appellate court awards to ensure equality among similarly placed landowners, overriding a strict interpretation of the definition of 'Court' under Section 3(d).

25 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Hubballi-Ankola Broad Gauge Line, where the appellants, landowners, lost their land and we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Disposal of Section 28A Applications Despite Pending Appeals in Land Acquisition Case. Landowners' Applications for Redetermination of Compensation Cannot Be Kept Pending Solely Due to Pendency of State's Appeals Against Reference Court Award.

7 Feb 2014

The petitioners were owners of lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. An award under Section 11 was made in 1988. In 1999, they filed ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Regarding Lok Adalat Award as Basis for Compensation Redetermination. Court Held That Lok Adalat Award Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Does Not Qualify as Determination by 'Court' Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Based on Compromise and Lacks Adjudicatory Function.

3 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in relation to Awards p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that reference under Section 28-A(3) is maintainable even if the original award was not challenged by the claimant.

31 Aug 2005

The State of Goa, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer, filed a first appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP of Landowner Seeking Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Collector's Order Not Vitiated as Petitioner Failed to Inform About Pending Appeals and Did Not Seek Reference Under Section 28A(3). The Court held that the principle in Babua Ram v. State of U.P. requiring the Collector to await final appellate decree applies only when the Collector is aware of pending appeals; here, the Collector acted in good faith.

26 Feb 2019

The case involves a challenge by M/s. Model Economic Township Ltd. (petitioner) against the dismissal of its writ petition by the Punjab and Haryana H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Statutory Corporation Seeking Recovery of Compensation from Landowners After Acquisition Lapse. Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 11 Award Does Not Create Debt Obligation; Remedy Lies in Civil Court.

20 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, a statutory corporation established under the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

14 Feb 2014

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Redetermination of Compensation Under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Beneficial Interpretation to Uphold Rights of Marginalized Landowners in Land Acquisition Cases.

10 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court reiterated that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act must be interpreted as a beneficial provision to remove inequality in compe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Petition for Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' application under Section 28A rejected as they failed to file within prescribed period and did not obtain reference under Section 18.

24 Feb 2014

The petitioners, three agriculturists, challenged an order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nanded, rejecting their application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28(A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Limitation Period Computed from Date of Knowledge of Award. Petitioners' application for redetermination of compensation held within limitation as time runs from date of knowledge of the award, not from the date of award.

25 Jan 2012

The petitioners, whose lands were acquired for the Mukane Dam Project, sought redetermination of compensation under Section 28(A) of the Land Acquisit...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)