Search Results for "Ransom"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Ransom"

120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom.

19 Jan 2018

The appellant, Lalit Vilasrao Thakare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (V), Nagpur in Sessions Case No.78 of 2013 for offences punishab...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Non-Proving of Essential Ingredients. The Court held that Section 364A IPC requires proof of threat to cause death or hurt or conduct giving rise to reasonable apprehension, which was not established by the prosecution, leading to acquittal.

28 Jun 2021

The appeal arose from a criminal case where the accused was convicted under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for kidnapping a school stude...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case — Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Ransom Demand, and Recovery of Body. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent only with the guilt of the accused under Sections 364A, 302, 120-B, 201 read with Section 34 IPC.

24 Apr 2020

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of an 8-year-old boy, Yug, son of Dr. Mukesh Chandak, a dentist in Nagpur. On 1st September 2014, Yug w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the chain of circumstances, including the appellant being last seen with the victim and recovery of the child from his custody, was sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 364-A IPC.

17 Jun 2013

The appellant, Naseem Ahmed Habib Ahmed, along with co-accused Mohd. Imran Islam Salamani and Mohd. Yamin Liyaqat Ali, was tried for offences under Se...

Supreme Court

Kidnapping Case Falls Apart: Court Acquits Accused Due to Procedural Flaws and Insufficient Evidence. A detailed examination of a kidnapping case reveals significant investigation lapses, leading to the acquittal of the accused and raising concerns about the integrity of the prosecution.

9 Jul 2024

A kidnapping case involving Sachin Garg and the subsequent legal proceedings. The key issues highlighted include procedural flaws, inconsistencies in ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction of Accused in Kidnapping Case from Section 364A to Section 363 IPC Due to Insufficient Evidence of Death Threat. The Court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredient of threat to cause death or hurt under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, leading to a reduction in the severity of the offence.

1 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by five accused persons whose convictions under Sections 148, 149, and 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for ki...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping Case Based on Recovery of Abductee and Circumstantial Evidence. Life Sentence Under Sections 364A/368 IPC Confirmed as Testimony of Child Victim and Recovery of Clothes and Toys Corroborate Prosecution Case.

1 Jan 2026

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which dismissed the criminal appeals of Harjindra Singh and Dilbag Singh @ Mitthu, uphol...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Kidnapping and Attempted Murder Case by Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 364A IPC. Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery Upheld as Prosecution Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt the Strangulation, Burning, and Looting of Victim, But Failed to Establish Ransom Demand Essential for Section 364A Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3 Jan 2024

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dated 26.06.2018, which dismissed the criminal appeals of the a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Kidnappers for Ransom and Attempt to Murder in Minor Boy Abduction Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 363, 364A, 307, 120B IPC and Section 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 for kidnapping a minor for ransom and throwing him into a well.

31 Jan 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by Bhagwan Gajanan Phandat and Madhao Ravindra Kapade against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

8 Feb 2019

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)