Search Results for "RDDBFI Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "RDDBFI Act"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order Refusing to Include Third-Party Properties in Recovery Certificate Under Section 19 of RDB Act. The court held that the DRT has no jurisdiction to include properties of persons who are not parties to the original application or guarantors, and the remedy lies before the civil court.

12 Dec 2024

The petitioners, M/s. SSA Constructions (a partnership firm) and its managing partner, obtained loan facilities from Andhra Bank (Respondent No. 1). T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

4 Sep 2023

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company Directors Due to Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Bar. Allegations of Filing False Affidavits and Documents in Court Proceedings Required Court's Written Complaint, Not Private Complaint Under Section 156(3).

16 Aug 2018

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by Shree Hari Rice & Agro Ltd. (respondent no.1) against M/s Lan Eseda Industries Ltd. (petitioner) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit. Bank Granted Conditional Leave to Defend on Deposit of Rs. 25 Lakhs for Triable Issues Regarding Liability as Mortgagee in Possession Under Order 37 CPC.

8 Oct 2015

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by ICICI Bank Limited (the applicant/original defendant No.1) against the order dated 30th June 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition of Auction Purchaser Against DRAT Order Setting Aside Sale Under RDDBFI Act. Petitioner Challenges Order Directing Refund of Bid Amount, Alleging Fraudulent Agreement to Defeat Auction Sale.

18 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Smt. K. Padma, auction purchaser of a property in a bank recovery sale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRAT Order in Debt Recovery Matter — Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of RDDBFI Act, 1993. The court held that an appeal against an interim order under Section 17 of the Act is maintainable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal under Section 18, and the Tribunal's order refusing to waive pre-deposit was not perverse or without jurisdiction.

23 Jun 2014

The petitioners, M/s. IDEB Projects Pvt Ltd and others, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitrator's Award on Res Judicata in Cooperative Bank Loan Dispute. Claim by Bank against Borrowers and Guarantors Dismissed as Barred by Res Judicata Due to Prior Adjudication of Same Dispute.

6 Feb 2012

The petitioner, The Shamrao Vithal Coop. Bank Ltd., a multi-state cooperative scheduled bank, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)