Search Results for "Punjab Preemption Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Punjab Preemption Act"

10 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Pre-emption Suit to Deposit Deficit Amount Due to Bona Fide Error and Court's Own Mistake. The Court held that the power to extend time under Section 148 CPC exists, and the appellants should not suffer for a calculation error where the court itself directed deposit of the incorrect amount.

3 May 2024

The case involves a pre-emption suit filed by the appellants' predecessor-in-interest against the respondents. The suit was decreed on 11.08.1988, req...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Pre-emption Suit, Holding That Right of Pre-emption Is a Weak Right and Must Be Strictly Proved — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Superior Right Under Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913.

17 Aug 2023

The present appeals arise from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 17.08.2007, which allowed two second appeals (RSA No.1470/...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Grant-in-Aid Claims Under Repealed 1994 Order. Employees of Non-Government Educational Institutions Entitled to Grant-in-Aid Despite Repeal of Orissa (Non Government Colleges, Junior Colleges and Higher Secondary Schools) Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994.

16 Sep 2019

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Odisha against various respondents, who are employees of non-government educational i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

20 Aug 2019

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeals in Grant-in-Aid Dispute, Holding No Vested Right Under Repealed 1994 Order. Employees Cannot Claim Grant-in-Aid After Repeal of Orissa (Non Government Colleges, Junior Colleges and Higher Secondary Schools) Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994, as Grant-in-Aid is Not a Vested Right and Depends on State's Economic Capacity Under Section 7C of Orissa Education Act, 1969.

9 Aug 2019

The appeals arose from a common question: whether employees of non-government educational institutions in Odisha could claim grant-in-aid under the Or...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Concurrent Findings of Collusive Decree in Property Dispute. The Court upheld the lower courts' conclusion that a decree obtained by collusion was not binding on the plaintiffs, and purchasers under a subsequent sale deed were bona fide purchasers.

7 May 2019

The appeal arose from a property dispute where the original plaintiff, Jaspal Singh, residing in West Germany, authorized Kidar Singh via a special po...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Adoption Dispute Due to Abatement — Conflict of Decrees Would Arise if Appeal Proceeded. Right to Sue Did Not Survive to Surviving Appellant Alone; Appeal Abated as a Whole Under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC.

7 May 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a suit challenging the validity of an adoption. The appellants, two brothers, had filed a suit seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Arbitration Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Petitioner Permitted to Amend Pleadings to Include Claim for Injunction Against Alienation of Partnership Property. Amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC allowed as it did not change nature of proceedings and was necessary to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

25 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Sanjay Suganchand Kasliwal, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his applications for amendment (Exh.35 and Exh.36) in a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Holds That a Will Bequeathing Property to a Daughter Does Not Confer Title Unless She Is in Possession and That Adverse Possession Must Be Pleaded and Proved. The court decreed partition of ancestral property in favour of co-owners, rejecting the claim of adverse possession by the respondents.

18 Dec 2006

The case involves a dispute over partition of ancestral property. The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for partition and separate possess...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether an Ex Parte Decree that is Set Aside Later Qualifies as a Decree of Court of First Instance in Preemption Cases. The Court examined the impact of the Haryana amendment to Section 15 of the Punjab Preemption Act, 1913, which removed the preemption right of cosharers, on pending proceedings.

1 Jan 1970

The case involved a dispute over preemption rights under the Punjab Preemption Act, 1913. The appellant, Vijay Singh, a cosharer, filed a suit for pos...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)