Search Results for "Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Mining Contract Interest Dispute — Security Deposit Does Not Carry Interest Despite Delayed Refund When Contract Expressly Bars Interest. Clause 19 of Form-L Contract Under Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1964 Precludes Interest on Security Deposit, and Section 34 CPC Does Not Apply to Contractual Deposits.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves appeals by the State of Haryana and its officers against a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which directed payment of i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Royalty Dispute Over Brick Earth Extraction — Ownership Presumption Under Section 42 of Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and Royalty Levy Under Mines and Mineral (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 Upheld. The Court held that royalty on minor minerals is leviable irrespective of land ownership and that the High Court erred in decreeing the suit without considering the presumption of ownership in favour of the State.

20 Feb 2025

The State of Punjab and its officers appealed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had decreed the suits filed by brick kil...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Cement Company Seeking Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition — Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sales and Potential Use

7 Jul 2023

The appellant, M/s Bagalkot Cement & Industries Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, owned land in Bagalkot that was acquired b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prosecution for Illegal Sand Mining Under IPC and Mines Act. Police Investigation Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act as Theft Under IPC is a Distinct Offence.

4 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by Kanwar Pal Singh, a director of M/s Kanwar Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., challenging his prosecution for illegal san...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Prohibit Export of Sand Under MMDR Act - Gujarat Rules Restricting Inter-State Sand Movement Held Valid. The Court held that the prohibition on export of sand was a reasonable restriction under Article 304(b) of the Constitution, aimed at preventing illegal mining and conserving natural resources.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves appeals by the State of Gujarat against the Gujarat High Court's judgment striking down Rules that prohibited the export of ordinary...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Validity of Rule 5 of Goa Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2002 — Declares Quarry Lease Valid Despite Deletion of Chapter III. Rule 5, which deleted Chapter III of the Goa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1985, is held intra vires Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, as the State Government has power to make rules for grant of quarry leases in respect of land belonging to private persons.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Maria Teresa Philomena D'Rocha Pegado, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the constitutional v...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)