Search Results for "Proximate link"

197 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 197 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Proximate Link and Inordinate Delay. Partnership Business Losses Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC Without Direct Instigation or Active Abetment.

The applicant, Hareshbhai Karshanbhai Kakadiya (Patel), filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Inordinate Delay Between Arrest and Detention. Delay of 37 Days Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Alminha, wife of the detenu Mohammed Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of 32 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Section 2(e) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Sakthivel, father of the detenu Sathiyaseelan, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Detention Order Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Snapped. Unexplained delay of 46 days between arrest and detention order renders subjective satisfaction doubtful under preventive detention law.

The petitioner, G. Annakili, wife of the detenu Gunasekaran, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Snapping of Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Without Explanation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Surya, brother of the detenu Karthick, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras...