Search Results for "Promotional increment"

63 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Increment for Unqualified Translator — Promotion Without Required Qualification Does Not Entitle Employee to Increment Under Section 30 of Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016

The writ petitioner, K. Ponni, was initially holding the post of Head Clerk at Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur. She was promoted as translator, Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Teachers Against Withdrawal of Incentive Increment for Higher Educational Qualifications — Held That Incentive Increment Once Granted Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Authority of Law and That G.O.Ms.No.324 of 1995 Removes Restriction on Subject Specialization.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by teachers (Secondary Grade Teachers, B.T Assistants, Elementary School Headmasters, and Middle Schoo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Granting Additional Increments to Graduate Employees Promoted to Clerks in BEST Undertaking. The court held that BCR No.19 applies to all graduate clerks, including those promoted from lower categories, and denial amounts to unfair labour practice.

The case involves a challenge by the BEST Undertaking against an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 20 March 2021, in Complaint (ULP) No. 49...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.

The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner entitled to pay re-fixation from promotion date and junior's promotion dates with 6% interest on delayed arrears.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, entitled to re-fixation of basic pay from promotion date and interest on delayed payment under Article 226.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...