Search Results for "Promotees"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Quashing Seniority List. Seniority of Direct Recruit Inspectors Cannot Be Antedated Over Promotees Without Following DoPT OM and Recruitment Rules.

The case involves a challenge to the seniority list dated 07.12.2021 and paragraph 7(iii) of DoPT OM dated 13.08.2021 by promotee Inspectors (Examiner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute — Date of Appointment Prevails Over Year of Vacancy. Promotees appointed on 01.03.2007 are senior to direct recruits appointed on 14.08.2007 and 24.11.2007 under the Manipur Police Service Rules, 1965.

The case involves an inter-se seniority dispute between promotees and direct recruits in the Manipur Police Service Grade II Officers Cadre. The promo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.

The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...