Could not generate case title
3 May 2026Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
Search Results for "Price escalation"
12 result(s) found
Found 12 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Interim Applications in Property Assignment and Supplemental Agreement Dispute. The court held that an unregistered supplemental agreement cannot modify a registered deed of assignment and was frustrated due to non-fulfillment of conditions, while the plaintiff's rights under the assignment were upheld.
4 Mar 2026The dispute arose between Applicant (Plaintiff) and (Defendant No.1) over a property assignment. On 20.11.2012, Defendant No.1 executed a registered D...
- 129
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquired Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Market Value Assessment Based on Auction Sale Prices with Deductions for Development Held Reasonable, Affirming High Court's Decision.
22 Apr 2025The dispute arose from cross-appeals concerning the assessment of market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in Narsingi and...
- 100
High Court
Arbitration Award Upheld on Waste Collection Contract Dispute. High Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Price Escalation, Waste Segregation, and Jurisdiction in Municipal Waste Management Contract
18 Mar 2025Arbitration Jurisdiction – The High Court held that the arbitration clause in the original contract covered the Ghansoli Area, which was later merg...
- 221
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.
4 Jan 2024The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...
- 67
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Setting Aside of Penalty on Contractors in Government Contract Dispute. Penalty Imposition During Extension of Time Found Impermissible Under Clause 3.5.5(v) of Odisha Public Work Department Code, Volume I, Which Applies Only to Contract Termination Scenarios.
24 Mar 2023The Supreme Court heard appeals filed by the State of Orissa challenging the High Court's decision to set aside penalties imposed on contractors while...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MRTP Act Case Upholding Commission's Finding of No Unfair Trade Practices. The Court Held That Extra Charges and Cancellation of Apartment Allotment Were Contractual and Did Not Constitute Unfair Trade Practices Under Sections 36-A and 36-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.
25 Jan 2022The appeal arose from a judgment dated 19.01.2009 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, which dismissed a complaint...
- 55
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reinstates Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute Under Arbitration Act, 1940. The Court held that judicial interference in arbitral awards is limited to grounds of error on the face of the award or misconduct, and the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence on extension of time, termination validity, and idle hire charges.
18 Jan 2022The dispute arose from a construction contract dated 16th November 1988 between a construction company (appellant-claimant) and the Union of India (re...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Government's Appeal in Road Construction Contract Dispute, Upholding Contractor's Payment Claim Based on Final Joint Survey Report. Payment Obligation Arises Under Contractual Terms as per General Conditions of Contract, Clause 2.8.1, with High Court's Order for Payment of Rs. 31,57,16,134/- with Interest Affirmed.
6 Sep 2021The dispute arose from a road construction contract under the Special Accelerated Rural Development Programme (SARDP) for improvement of road from Lum...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over 'Change in Law' Clause — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Interpretation of contractual clause by Arbitral Tribunal was plausible and not perverse, hence not liable to be set aside under Section 34.
11 May 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by South East Asia Marine Engineering and Constructions Ltd. (SEAMEC Ltd.) against the judgment of the Gauh...
- 97
