Search Results for "Presumption Under Section 139"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Presumption Under Section 139"

332 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Successful Rebuttal of Presumptions and Unjustified Appellate Interference. The Court held that the accused raised a probable defence under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the High Court erred in overturning the Trial Court's acquittal as the findings were not perverse.

22 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant alleged lending Rs. 20,00,000...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of possession of child pornography under POCSO and IT Act. Mere possession or downloading of child pornography is not an offense under POCSO unless accompanied by intent to distribute or transmit. However, POCSO's strict provisions aim to protect children, considering child pornography's significant impact on societal welfare.

23 Sep 2024

Scope of Section 15 of the POCSO: The primary legal issue was whether mere possession of child pornographic material without intent to distribut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Prove Loan Repayment or Dispute Existence of Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

26 Jul 2024

The appellant-complainant, Sri Krishna Reddy M, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Loan of Rs. 1,00,000 advanced by LIC agent to acquaintance not proved as legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

9 Oct 2023

The complainant-appellant, Sharanappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted. Complainant's Failure to Prove Financial Capacity Does Not Automatically Discharge Accused When Execution of Cheque is Admitted.

20 Nov 2020

The appellant/complainant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.12.2010 passed by the XV...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal Due to Misapplication of Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court held that once issuance of cheque and signature are admitted, the presumption of legally enforceable debt arises, and the accused must lead evidence to rebut it.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, APS Forex Services Pvt. Ltd., a foreign exchange business, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's inconsistent evidence and lack of financial capacity led to upholding of acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 Jul 2019

The appellant, Vikas Gopi Bhagat, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Insufficient Rebuttal of Presumption. The Court held that the accused successfully raised a probable defence by questioning the complainant's financial capacity and the circumstances of the loan, thereby rebutting the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

27 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the accused against the High Court of Karnataka's judgment convicting him under Section 138 of the Negotiabl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

31 Jan 2018

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)