Search Results for "Port limits"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BPCL's Challenge to Service Tax on Port Storage Charges. Storage charges collected by Mumbai Port Trust from BPCL for storing petroleum products are taxable as 'port services' under Section 65(105)(zzl) of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioners, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) and its Territory Manager, filed a writ petition challenging the demand of Service Tax by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Steamer Agent Challenging Port Trust Circular Limiting Storage Duration. Circular Held Valid as Administrative Measure to Decongest Port, Not a Tariff Fixation.

The appellant, Maheshwary Handling Agency Private Limited, a steamer agent, challenged a circular dated 31st August 1998 issued by the Traffic Manager...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute. Charter Party Agreement's Demurrage Clause Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Excepted Perils.

The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...