Search Results for "Pension Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Pension Rules"

795 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Retired High Court Judges for Full Pension Including District Judiciary Service. Services Rendered as District Judges Must Be Counted for Full Pension Under High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court in this suo motu writ petition and connected matters addressed multiple issues concerning pension and other retirement benefits paya...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Interest Case — No Interest on Delayed DCRG and CVP When Judicial Proceedings Were Pending at Retirement. Rule 4 of Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 disentitles commutation during pendency of judicial proceedings.

8 Mar 2019

The case pertains to an appeal by the Chief General Manager, Gujarat Telecom Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and others against the judgment of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Retired Employees in Cooperative Bank Pension Dispute - Pension Scheme Cannot Be Unilaterally Discontinued After Employees Have Opted and Availed Benefits Under Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Banks Employees Pension, Family Pension and General Provident Fund Rules, 1989. The Court held that pension is a deferred wage and accrued right, and amendments to service rules under Section 84A(2) of Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 must be prospective, protecting employees' legitimate expectations.

11 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.'s decision to discontinue a pension scheme introduced in 1989 f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses RSRTC Appeals, Upholds Pension Rights of Absorbed Employees. Transfer of CPF Amount by Provident Fund Commissioner Satisfies Condition for Pension Under Circular Dated 02.07.1991.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals filed by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) challenging the judgments of the Rajasthan Hig...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Second National Judicial Pay Commission Recommendations for District Judiciary — Upholds Uniform Pay, Pension, and Service Conditions as Essential for Judicial Independence. The Court held that financial security and economic independence of judicial officers are part of the basic structure of the Constitution, and directed uniform pay revision with a multiplier of 2.81 and pension at 50% of last drawn pay.

19 May 2023

The Supreme Court, in a writ petition filed by the All India Judges Association, addressed the implementation of the Second National Judicial Pay Comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioners' Writ Petitions for Full Pension Benefits Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service Rules. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and cannot be withheld or reduced arbitrarily; respondents directed to pay full pension with interest.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, seeking full pension and pensionary benefits...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Amount Under Joint Note. The court held that the three-day condition imposed by the bank was arbitrary and unreasonable, and that the petitioner's substantive right to pension could not be defeated by a procedural technicality.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Option to Voluntary Retiree in State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Case — Regulation 18 of Pension Regulations Applies for Eligibility, Not Just Calculation. The court held that the bank's communication denying pension eligibility under Regulation 18 was erroneous and directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's pension option.

21 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Vandana w/o Eknath Bhondwe, a retired employee of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (now State Bank of India), filed a writ petition chal...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)