Search Results for "Pension Regulations Army 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Pension Regulations Army 1961"

29 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Armed Forces Tribunal Case, Directs Grant of Disability Pension. Disability pension entitlement upheld as disease leading to discharge presumed attributable to military service under Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, with rounding off to 50% from 01.01.1996, setting aside Tribunal's dismissal based on disability below 20%.

23 Apr 2025

The dispute involved an appeal under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, concerning the entitlement of a former army personnel to disability pension....

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Special Pension to Ex-Serviceman. Special Pension Under Para 164 of Pension Regulations for Army, 1961 is Discretionary and Not a Vested Right, Tribunal's Order Set Aside.

7 Mar 2025

The High Court of Madras allowed a writ petition filed by the Union of India challenging the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chennai Bench, which ...

High Court

Madras High Court Examines Union Government's Challenge to Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Disability Pension – Dharamvir Singh Judgment's Applicability to Post-2008 Pension Regulations Considered. The Writ Petition Raised the Question Whether the AFT Erroneously Applied Dharamvir Singh to Pre-2008 Regulations While the Release Medical Board's Opinion Remained Unrebutted Under the 2008 Rules.

7 Mar 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Union of India through the Ministry of Defence and others, challengi...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition by Employer in Disability Pension Dispute, Setting Aside Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Pension Based on Dharamvir Singh Precedent. The Court Held That Dharamvir Singh Relied on Old Pension Regulations With Presumption Clause and Was Not Applicable to the New Pension Regulations for Army, 2008, Where Release Medical Board Opinion on Attributability is Final Unless Rebutted, Requiring Fresh Consideration Under the New Regulations.

7 Mar 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Union of India challenging the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, R...

High Court

Madras High Court examines challenge by Union of India to Armed Forces Tribunal order granting disability pension under new Army Pension Regulations, 2008. Tribunal had relied on Dharamvir Singh precedent under old regulations; court analyses attributability and onus of proof under new scheme.

7 Mar 2025

The Madras High Court heard a writ petition filed by the Union of India under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order of the Armed F...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Territorial Army Ex-Havildar Seeking Pension Due to Insufficient Embodied Service. Service Pension Under Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, Regulation 132 Requires 15 Years Actually Rendered Service, and Unembodied Service Cannot Be Counted.

12 Feb 2025

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an ex-Havildar of the Territorial Army challenging the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, wh...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Territorial Army Havildar's Pension Claim After 29-Year Delay, Upholding Armed Forces Tribunal Order. Court Rules That Only Embodied Service Qualifies Under Regulation 132 of Army Pension Regulations, 1961 and Unembodied Service Cannot Be Reckoned; Reservist Category Inapplicable.

4 Feb 2025

The case pertains to a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court by a former Havildar of the Ter...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Disability Pension Case for Territorial Army Member - Statutory Regulations Override Departmental Denial. Disability Pension Granted Under Regulation 173 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, as Extended to Territorial Army by Regulation 292, Since Disability Was Attributable to Military Service and Assessed at 80%.

7 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute over the entitlement of a Territorial Army member to disability pension. The appellant, after serving in the Regular A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

30 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Disability Pension Case — Injury During Casual Leave for Private Purpose Not Attributable to Military Service. Court holds that an injury sustained while on casual leave for a private activity (purchasing goods for sister) has no causal connection with military service, reversing the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension.

20 Sep 2019

The case involves an appeal by the Government of India against an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal granting disability pension to Dharambir Singh, a...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)