Search Results for "PFA Rules"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 14 and Section 13(2) of PFA Act. Benefit of Doubt Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Proper Stirring of Oil Sample and Timely Intimation of Right to Get Sample Analyzed.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment dated 27-11-2002 in Regular Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Proper Evidence. Failure to Examine Panch Witness and Prove Licence Requirement Leads to Acquittal Under Section 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Jayram Atmaram Shadija, proprietor of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Division and Sealing of Samples Leads to Upholding of Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused for offences under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 50 of PFA Rules Regarding Preservative Addition and Timely Dispatch of Sample to Public Analyst Leads to Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23.3.2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akola, District Ahmed...