Search Results for "Order XXXIX Rule 11(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Order XXXIX Rule 11(2)"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

High Court

High Court Sets Aside MACT Order Deleting Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim -- Premature Deletion Without Evidence Violates Natural Justice -- Reinstatement of Party for Proper Adjudication Under Motor Vehicles Act

12 Jan 2026

The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed a writ petition challenging an order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) that deleted Bajaj Allianz ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Stay Suit Pending Rectification. Civil Court Has Concurrent Jurisdiction to Decide Infringement and Validity of Trademark Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Laxmi Balaji Industries and M/s. Sri Laxmi Vinayaka Rice Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

14 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

3 Aug 2019

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal Against Trial Court's Order Setting Aside Its Own Restoration Order Without Jurisdiction. Trial Court Cannot Rectify Its Own Error Under Order XXXIX Rule 11(2) CPC as It Becomes Functus Officio.

28 Jun 2017

The appeal arises from an order dated 25.8.2015 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Akola in M.J.C. No. 937/2014. The appellant, Purushottam N...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)