Search Results for "Order XXI Rule 101"

45 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance, Directs Execution of Possession in Favor of Appellants. Collusion Between Vendors and Respondents to Frustrate Decree Cannot Defeat the Fruits of Justice

Specific Performance and Possession – The Supreme Court held that the appellants were entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement and po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows BDA's Appeal in Execution Proceedings: Right, Title or Interest Must Be Adjudicated Under Order XXI Rule 101 CPC. The Court held that an obstructor claiming title need not prove possession to be heard in execution proceedings.

The case involves an appeal by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) against the dismissal of its applications under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC in exec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holders' Appeals Against Executing Court's Interim Stay Order in Execution Proceedings. Held That Executing Court Cannot Stay Execution Beyond Order XXI Rule 29 CPC and Must Follow Procedure Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Before Arrest.

The case involves appeals by the decree-holders (appellants) against an interim order dated 29th June 2018 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Kottayam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings — Impugned Order Quashed. Court Held That Executing Court Must Consider Objections of Third Party Obstructor on Merits Under Order XXI Rules 97, 98, and 101 CPC.

The petitioner, Rajesh Enterprises, a partnership firm represented by its partner Naresh Godar Shah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...