Search Results for "Order XVIII Rule 2(3A)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Order XVIII Rule 2(3A)"

2 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Denial of Oral Hearing by Successor Judge. Order XVIII Rule 2(3A) CPC Does Not Dispense with Oral Arguments When Judge Changes.

2 Jul 2010

The appellant, Rukhana Associates, filed a suit for specific performance of an actionable claim and declaration against E-Square Leisure Pvt. Ltd. (fo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction of Former Municipal President in Handing Over Charge Dispute Due to Non-Compliance with Prosecution Procedure. Conviction Under Section 23A(3) of Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 Set Aside as Prosecution Was Not Initiated by Standing Committee or Chief Officer as Mandated by Section 200(1).

18 Apr 1968

The case arose from a dispute over the handing over of charge by a retiring President of a municipal borough. The appellant, K. M. Kanavi, was removed...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)