Search Results for "Order 41 Rule 21"

2 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Order Restoring Ex-Parte Regular Appeal Filed by Defendant in Title Suit. Presumption of Service Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897 Stands Unrebutted as Power of Attorney Holder Lacked Personal Knowledge to Lead Evidence.

The Civil Revision Petition arose out of a title suit (O.S. No. 466/2011) filed by one Smt. Akkayamma seeking declaration of title and permanent injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Due to Invalid Substituted Service. Court holds that permission for substituted service under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC requires satisfaction that defendant is avoiding service, and mere non-service is insufficient.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Ramesh Jagannath Ingole, against the judgment of the first appellate court which al...