Search Results for "Order 23 Rule 3"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Trial Court Order in Land Dispute -- Directs Consent Decree Under CPC -- Petitioners Wins Writ Petition Against Respondents Family Members

The Petitioner, filed a writ petition challenging an order by the Trial Court that refused to pass a decree based on Consent Terms agreed upon by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Disposes Writ Petition Under Article 227 of Constitution of India, Directs Trial Court to Reconsider Compromise Decree in Ancestral Property Dispute Involving Fraud Allegations

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India to quash a compromise decree in OS No. 123/2025, alleging it was frau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Temple Receivership Dispute, Remands for Fresh Consideration. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its contempt jurisdiction by setting aside the Trial Court's order appointing a Seven Member Committee as Receiver under Order XL Rule 1 CPC.

The appeal arose from a High Court order in a contempt petition that set aside a Trial Court's order appointing a Seven Member Committee as Receiver f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Restoration of Appeal Allowed: Compromise Non-compliance Entitles Statutory Remedy. Failure to honor compromise terms allows restoration of appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure.

The Supreme Court held that in cases of non-compliance with compromise terms, a party has the statutory right to seek restoration of an appeal. The Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Registration. Compromise Decree Arising from Family Settlement Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908, as Parties Had Pre-existing Rights as Heirs.

The dispute involved two sons of late Vijendra Singh contesting ownership of ancestral land. The appellant filed a suit for possession in 1978, disput...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...