Search Results for "Order 23 Rule 3"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Order 23 Rule 3"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Compromise Petition in Partition Suit — Failure to Comply with Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Renders Order Unsustainable. The court held that the trial court must record satisfaction as to the lawful agreement before rejecting a compromise petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

18 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who were defendants No. 2 to 4 in O.S. No. 55/2013 pending before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Kudligi, filed a writ petition under Arti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat Due to Fraud and Non-Compliance with Legal Formalities. Petitioner, not a party to the original suit, successfully challenges decree obtained by misrepresentation and without proper verification under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

18 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Pooja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalabura...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Revision Against Consent Decree in Property Suit — Co-operative Society Cannot Challenge Compromise Without Impleading Chairman Alleged of Mala Fides. Consent decree under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC upheld as valid compromise binding on society.

11 Sep 2019

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Nira and Palm Product Producers Co-operative Society Ltd. and its Secretary, Director, and a m...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings: Consent Decree Enforceable Despite Absence of Formal Decree. The Court held that a consent order under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC is a decree and executable even without a formal decree being drawn.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, Sir Sobha Singh And Sons Pvt. Ltd., against the judgment of the Delhi High Court. The dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Challenge to Compromise Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — Compromise Not Binding as Plaintiff's Advocate Had No Authority to Enter into Compromise Without Express Consent. The court held that an advocate's implied authority does not extend to compromising a suit without the client's express consent, and the trial court erred in rejecting the plaintiff's application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

20 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ashok Babulal Agrawal, was the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 29 of 2011 filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Divis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

9 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Validity of Consent Decree. Court holds that a consent decree passed in a suit for administration of trust is not null and void and can be challenged only on grounds of fraud or collusion, which were not established.

8 Jan 2014

The original plaintiff, Sushilabai Byramji, filed Regular Civil Suit No.63 of 1982 seeking rendition of accounts, execution of trusts, setting aside o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Compromise Decree Dispute — Regular Civil Appeal Not Maintainable Against Consent Decree Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The Court held that a consent decree cannot be challenged by a regular appeal and the lower appellate court's remand order was without jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2012

The appellant, Ramesh Balaji Ekhande, original plaintiff no.5, challenged the judgment dated 17.3.2008 passed by the District Judge-3, Nasik in Civil ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Loan Recovery Case — Decree Satisfaction Set Aside Due to Lack of Consent. Court holds that a decree cannot be marked satisfied without the consent of the decree-holder or a valid compromise recorded under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

19 Jul 2005

The Industrial Credit & Investment Corporation of India Ltd. (ICICI) filed a suit against Radha Silk Mills Ltd. for recovery of a foreign currency loa...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)