Search Results for "Order 18 Rule 17"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Order 18 Rule 17"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Licensee's Challenge to Rejection of Additional Evidence in Suit for Possession. Court holds that applications for leading further evidence and production of additional documents were filed belatedly and without sufficient cause, and that the Appellate Bench's concurrent findings do not warrant interference under Article 227.

28 Apr 2026

The Petitioner, Amines And Plasticizers Limited, was a licensee in two office premises owned by the Respondent, APL Holdings and Investments Limited a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Sufficient Cause for Recalling Witness Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC

18 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Channabasappa S/o Shivappa Hosamani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence After Plaintiff's Side Closed. Court Held That Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Evidence or to Remedy Negligence of Party.

24 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Sri P. Ramaprasad, was the plaintiff in O.S. No. 231/2019 pending before the XIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Witness Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as No Error or Perversity Found in Refusing Recall After Plaintiff Closed Evidence and Defendant's Evidence Was in Progress.

7 Apr 2022

The petitioner, as plaintiff, filed a suit for recovery of money against the respondent in O.S.No.563/2010 before the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) &...

High Court

High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Recall of Plaintiff in Will Dispute — Failure to Consider Evidence and Non-Compliance with Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. Court holds that recalling a witness for further examination is not permissible after the plaintiff's evidence is closed and the suit is posted for judgment, as it would cause prejudice to the other side.

21 Oct 2020

The petitioner, Smt. Gangamma, filed a suit for declaration and injunction based on a registered Will executed by her father Thimmanna. The suit was f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that the trial court did not err in rejecting application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC for recalling witnesses, as the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the evidence sought to be adduced was not within their knowledge earlier.

14 Sep 2020

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the petitioners (defendants in th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to allow a party to adduce additional evidence after closure of evidence.

24 Feb 2020

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness in Civil Suit for Cross-Examination on Newly Discovered Documents — Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine Plaintiff's Witness on Documents Discovered After Examination.

18 Jun 2019

The petitioner, defendant no. 2 in Regular Civil Suit No. 66 of 2009, challenged the order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kadegaon, reject...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit — No Error in Discretion Exercised Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC.

10 Jun 2014

The petitioners, defendants in a civil suit, challenged the order of the trial court dated 28.2.2014 rejecting their application under Order 18 Rule 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Civil Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Not Affected by Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that the trial court has power to recall witnesses for cross-examination even after they have been examined, if necessary for just decision.

18 Jul 2012

The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit, filed an application under Order 18 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)