Search Results for "Occupier liability"

Trending :

Search Results for "Occupier liability"

177 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Occupier in Factory Fatality Case, Quashes Criminal Complaint for Lack of Vicarious Liability. Occupier of Patanjali Foods Limited not vicariously liable under Sections 92, 94, 101 of Factories Act, 1948 as complaint lacked specific allegations of negligence or knowledge regarding fatal accident of worker Rajendra Dewade.

15 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Ram Bharat, occupier of Patanjali Foods Limited, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

22 Jul 2022

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Criminal Complaint Under Factories Act; Occupier Contends Non-Joinder of Company and Lack of Order Viciate Proceedings Under Section 7A(2)(c) of the Factories Act, 1948.

6 Dec 2021

The petitioner, the occupier of M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

19 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Occupier's Challenge to Deposit Condition in Property Tax Appeal. Section 217(5) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Allows Appellate Court to Impose Deposit Condition Despite Section 209(3) Limitation on Occupier's Liability.

21 Jul 2011

The petitioners, Dena Bank and its manager, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 26 March 2...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by ESIC Against Acquittal in Contribution Default Case. Failure to Prove Director Was In Charge of Day-to-Day Business Under Section 85(a) of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

13 Apr 2005

The Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed a complaint under Section 85(a) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against M/s. Cortali...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Interpretation of Factories Act Duty: Occupier's Liability Includes Failure to Prevent Entry into Dangerous Pit. The Court Held That Under Section 36(3) and (4) of the Factories Act, 1948, 'Permitted to Enter' Encompasses a Duty to Prevent Entry, and Safety Apparatus Must Be Immediately Available at the Pit at All Times.

4 Sep 1959

The appeal arose from a prosecution of an occupier of a factory under Section 36(3) and (4) of the Indian Factories Act, 1948, following the death of ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)