Search Results for "Nullity of Decree"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Nullity of Decree"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Execution — Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Raised in Execution Proceedings Under Section 47 CPC. The Court held that an objection to territorial jurisdiction must be raised at the earliest opportunity in the trial court under Section 21 CPC and cannot be entertained in execution unless lack of inherent jurisdiction appears on the face of the record.

7 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Jharkhand which restored an objection under Section 47 CPC filed by the first respondent in exec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Res Judicata Bar. Suit challenging earlier decree held barred by res judicata as the issue of title was directly and substantially in issue in previous proceedings.

24 Feb 2005

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit filed by the Appellants (original plaintiffs) seeking a declaration that the judgment and decree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Execution Order in Redemption Suit — Execution Court Has Power to Decide Nullity Objection. Decree Passed by Competent Court Is Not a Nullity and Execution Can Proceed.

11 Mar 2019

The petitioner, original defendant No. 2 in a suit for redemption, challenged an order dated 17 August 2018 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holds Partial Abatement Only. Death of some appellants during pendency of appeal does not abate entire appeal; decree not a nullity under Order 22 CPC.

17 Oct 2011

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession. The original suit was filed by the plaintiffs (now respon...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Executability of Decree on Ground of Non-Compliance with Order XX Rule 4 CPC. Judgment Debtor Cannot Raise Nullity of Decree Under Section 47 CPC After Ex-Parte Decree Became Final and Earlier Application to Set Aside Was Dismissed.

9 Jan 2026

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by Srinivasa Doss (petitioner) against P.Kalaidasan and P.Seshian (respondents) challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amendment of Decree Under Section 152 CPC — Correction of Decree Beyond Clerical Error Held Impermissible as It Altered Relief Granted in Original Judgment. The court held that Section 152 CPC permits only correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes or errors from accidental slip or omission, not alteration of relief on merits, and the amendment sought to change the decree from delivery of possession of entire blocks to a restricted share, which was beyond the scope of Section 152.

13 Mar 2025

The petitioner, original defendant, challenged an order dated 26 October 2018 passed by the learned District Judge, Barshi, allowing an application un...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Petition to Reject Wife's Suit Challenging Divorce Decree — Family Court's Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 7 of Family Courts Act. The Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a suit for declaration that its own decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is null and void; the proper remedy is appeal.

17 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Chethan D.S., and the respondent, Manjushree N.T., were married on 5 September 2010. Differences arose, and they separated after about...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application Challenging Execution of Arbitral Award, Rejecting Argument that Only Debt Recovery Tribunal Had Jurisdiction. Arbitral Award for Loan Recovery Upheld as Respondent Finance Company Not Notified as Financial Institution Under Section 2(h) of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, and Therefore Section 18 Did Not Oust Arbitrator's Jurisdiction.

2 Aug 2011

The dispute arose when the petitioners borrowed money from the respondent and failed to repay, leading the respondent to invoke arbitration under the ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)