Search Results for "Negligence determination"

542 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was 30-year-old earning Rs.6,000 per month; Tribunal's assessment of income and multiplier modified.

The appellants, original claimants in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.26 of 2011, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 23.10.2012 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Finding on Negligence. Tribunal's Dismissal Set Aside as Composite Negligence Established and Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants (husband, son, and mother-in-law of the deceased) before the Motor Accide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Car Driver Upheld Due to Lack of Evidence on Contributory Negligence. Claimant's Unrebutted Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Award Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 17.03.2018 at about 9:15 p.m. The deceased, a Superintendent in the office of the Chief Conserv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...