Search Results for "NSEIL byelaws"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "NSEIL byelaws"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

10 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — Arbitrator's Refusal to Entertain Counterclaim Upheld as Within Jurisdiction. The court held that the arbitrator's decision to refrain from adjudicating the counterclaim regarding surplus in NSE capital market was within his jurisdiction and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Uttam Chand Garg, challenged an arbitral award dated 16th March 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under the byelaws of the National Sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Stock Broker Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Determined by NSEIL Byelaws, Not by Agreement Clause.

3 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Private Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 April 2010 passed by a panel of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Notes and Liability Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

24 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings that the respondent was entitled to recover the amount due from the petitioner for squared-off positions, rejecting the petitioner's counterclaim.

17 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kritika Nagpal, appointed the respondent, Geojit Financial Services Ltd., to effect transactions on the Futures & Options Segment of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Perverse.

2 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Sunil Keshav Rane, challenged an arbitral award dated 28 April 2009 passed by an arbitrator under the Byelaws, Rules and Regulations o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Mandatory Time Limit Under NSEIL Byelaws. Award passed beyond six-month period without extension provision is illegal and liable to be quashed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 19 September 2009 passed by a panel of Arbitrators appointed under the Byelaws, Rule...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Due to Perverse Findings. Arbitrator's Failure to Consider Admitted Documents and Ledger Accounts Constitutes Patent Illegality Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd., a stock broker and member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL) and Bombay Stock Exchang...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)